Peter I of Russia is one of those few European leaders who have been accredited with the title The Great’. As Tsar of Russia, Peter earned this accolade through his modernisation and westernisation of the country, turning it from a minor country to major European power within his lifetime. His methods may not always have been moral but his results were impressive.
Peter was born Pyotr Alexeyevich Romanov in Moscow on the 30th May 1672. Peter was one of a number of children of the Russian Tsar, Alexis I. Peter’s mother was the Tsar’s second wife, Nataliva Kyrillovna Naryshkina. Peter’s early childhood was a privileged one, but not a particularly happy one.
Alexis I died in 1676, when Peter was just four. The role of Tsar was passed to Peter’s half-brother, Feodor III. This transition was relatively smooth as the line of succession was clear. Problems arose though when Feodor died in 1682. Feodor had no children and as such the throne should have passed to another of Peter’s half-brother’s Ivan V. Ivan though was a sickly child. Thus the Russian nobles declared that Peter was to become the Tsar.
This declaration incited a dispute between the families of Alexis I’s two wives, the Naryshkin and Miloslavsky, about which of their sons should become Tsar. Sophia Alekseyevna, Peter’s step-sister and a Miloslavsky, organised a rebellion with the backing of the Russian elite military corps, the Streltsy. The rebellion was a bloody one, and Peter himself witnessed the butchering of a number of his friends and family. Seeing his best friend and uncle killed are often seen as a cause of some of Peter’s mental and physical problems in later years.
With military backing it was Sophia who was ultimately successful with her rebellion. Sophia insisted on a joint Tsar-ship, with her brother Ivan as the senior Tsar. As both Tsars were underage, Sophia acted as regent exercising complete rule, with the Tsars purely used as her mouth pieces. Sophia, was influenced herself by her lover, Prince Golitsin. It is not certain who actually came up with the Russian policies. During Sophia’s consortship there were unpopular domestic policies, as well as ineffectual foreign campaigns, including two disasters in the Crimea.
Peter was not actually too concerned about ruling the country. He was of course still a child, and would spend most of his time playing with his toy soldiers. Even into his teenage years, he found more enjoyment in travels to Germany and learning about ship building and sailing, than any element of government. Peter’s mother attempted to force him to take more of an interest in affairs of state. One method she adopted was a marriage to Eudoxia Lopukhina in 1689. The marriage though was a disaster from the start and Eudoxia soon found herself deserted by her husband.
Peter’s mother though was successful in getting him more interested in politics. Sophia’ seven years of rule came to an end in 1689 as Peter saw the unsuccessful Crimean campaigns as the tool he needed to take power. Using the Triotsky monastery as a seat of power, he gathered supporters to him. This time he also had the backing of most of the Streltsy.
At the age of 17, Peter had successfully unseated Sophia, although in name he was still co-Tsar with Ivan. Peter banished Sophia to a convent, and set about minimising the influence of Ivan. He did though have to deal with the interference of his mother, and in truth it was only with the death of Nataliva Naryshkina in 1694 that could exert his true power. Power which was made ultimate with the death of Ivan in 1696, when Peter was declared Sovereign of all Russia.
Peter’s travels to Western Europe in his youth, had taught Peter of the advancements available. He brought in advisors from these countries and started to implement reforms designed to modernise the country. One of the first areas he focused on was the nation’s army and navy. To make a fulltime navy worthwhile, Peter saw that Russia required maritime ports. The Baltic though was controlled by Sweden whilst the Black Sea was controlled by the Ottoman Empire.
Peter turned his forces to the Black Sea, which required the defeat of the Tatars and the Crimean Khan. The main fortress was that of Azov, it took Peter almost a year before the fortress fell to his forces. The fall of the fort allowed the creation of the first Russian naval base on the Black Sea’s coastline. Once won though the fortress had to be held, the Russian army was in no position to fight the might of the Ottoman Empire in a long drawn out war, thus Peter went on a diplomatic mission to the west to find support.
Diplomatically the mission was far from a success, Austria and France would not assist him. In other ways though the mission helped Peter, he advanced his knowledge of shipbuilding in Amsterdam, as well as sailing and navigation spending four months in the Dutch East India Company’s main shipyard. Peter also learnt about fire fighting, city building and much other western advancements.
He was though forced to return home to suppress a rebellion which sought to put Sophia back on the throne. The rebellion was ruthless crushed by Peter, who had 1200 of the rebels executed after a period of torture. Peter still recognised the need for military advancement. So in 1698 sent a party to the Knights of Malta, to learn their techniques and also to form an alliance.
Peter was now totally convinced that European customs were far more advanced than Russian ones. One of the more weird requirements that Peter made to ensure that Russia fell in line with Europe, was to make all civil servants and courtiers clean shaven. Anyone refusing to shave was to pay an annual beard tax. The other major alteration Peter made from this period was the changing of the New Year celebrations from the 1st September to 1st January.
With no alliance from Western governments, Peter made peace with the Ottoman Empire. Such was his diplomacy though he was even able to keep the captured Azov fort. Peter then looked to the north to assist his vision of Russian maritime supremacy. Peter wanted an all weather port, which meant the acquisition of a port on the Baltic. This though meant war with King Charles XII of Sweden. At the time the Swedish empire was a powerful force. Twenty-one years of fighting followed the declaration of war.
The war didn’t start well and but for the distraction of Charles XII, the Russian force could well have been wiped out in 1700. Success though followed and Peter took Izhora, which he promptly made the site of his new capital, St Petersburg, in 1703.
During this period he also decided to end his first marriage, Eudoxia Lopukhina was forced to become a nun, annulling his marriage, despite his wife bearing him three children. Of the three sons born, Alexei, Alexander and Pavel, only Alexei lived past his first birthday. Peter took a mistress, Martha Skavronskaya, and this time it appeared to be a relationship of love. Martha converted to the Russian Orthodox Church and changed her name to Catherine. The couple were secretly married in 1707, and then publicly married in 1712.
Catherine bore Peter seven children; Anna, Elizabeth, Natalia, Margarita, Peter, Pavel, and another Natalia. Anna and Elizabeth though were the only children to survive into adulthood.
Alexei from the first marriage didn’t live long into adulthood himself, as in 1718 he was convicted of high treason by his father. Secretly executed it is not clear whether it was for an attempted coup or failure to follow Peter’s orders and official policies.
The war against Sweden though took a turn for the worse in 1706, when Peter’s Polish ally King August II was forced to abdicate following Charles’ victory. Swedish forces marched into Russia although the loss of he reserve forces at the Battle of Lesnaya stopped the Swedish advance. In the summer of 1709 the Russian forces defeated the Swedish army at the Battle of Poltava forcing King Charles XII into exile within the Ottoman Empire.
Peter then turned his attention back to the Ottoman Empire, he did though over estimate his strength and army’s ability. The Russian forces were crushed and the ensuing peace treaty saw the loss of most of his Black Sea possessions. Charles XII was also returned to power in Sweden and so the battle to the north continued once again.
Peter though had made good usage of the years of control of the north and by 1714, the Russian navy was the most powerful in the Baltic arena. This power attached to more diplomacy from Peter ensured that some European nations, Hanover and Prussia, joined his force. It was though three years after Charles XII’s death in 1718 before peace with Sweden was achieved. The Great Northern War ended in 1721, with Russia acquiring Estonia and Livonia as well as Finnish lands around his new capital of St Petersburg. The war also ensured that Russia had ports open all year round, ensuring continual trade with the rest of Europe.
St Petersburg is worthy of note, as in 1712 Peter moved the Russian capital to the new city. The whole city was designed to be a modern European one, as opposed to the more traditional Moscow. It was here that Peter also built his main palace, Peterhof’ designed to compete with Versailles.
Following 1721 Russia had a period of peace, aside from excursions into Persia. In October 1721 Peter was acclaimed as Emperor of All Russia, Great Father of the Fatherland and The Great’. This period of peace allowed Peter to continue his reformation of the country.
Peter turned his attention to the Church. The Russian Orthodox Church was placed under the control of the state, and a new law was passed to ensure that no Russian man could become a monk before the age of 50.
In 1722, Peter created a Table of Ranks’ where position within the Russian Empire was determined on ability and services provided, no longer would birth guarantee a position. Peter also introduced a new parliament the Senat/Duma which would deal with the governing of the country in the absence of Peter. Peter introduced education to a proportion of the population. A law was passed to make all children of the nobility, government officials and clerk, between the ages of 10 and 15, would have to learn mathematics and geometry.
Peter also introduced new taxes to fund Peter’s projects to improve Russia. New head taxes were to be paid by all, but land taxes were reformed so that they were only payable by those who owned land and property. He put into use everything he had learnt during his lifetime.
Peter though had a mean streak. He had his first wife executed and was not averse to torture in case where he believed uprising was planned. There are also tales that he used his own servants in war games, where he used live ammunition in recreations of his toy soldier battles.
There is also one other notable fact about Peter. Peter was almost seven foot tall. He towered over his subjects and also his rival European leaders. Peter, in common with many Russian Tsars, though was not the healthiest of individuals. In 1724 he was forced into an operation to remove urine block.
Despite the need for recovery he went on a tour of Russia engineering projects. Legend has it that it was at a project along the Finnish Gulf that he personally rescued some drowning soldiers. The time in the water though is said to have brought about a bout of pneumonia, which caused his death on the 28th January 1725. A later autopsy though revealed gangrene in his bladder.
Peter died at the age of 52, following forty-two years of Russian rule. Peter though died without nominating an heir; as a result his wife took up the position of Empress.
Peter deserves the title Great’; he transformed Russia from a minor European country into a European power. An uneducated and uncivilised country was transformed into a modern nation with a modern army to enforce its will.
Copyright - First Published 28th March 2008
Thursday, 5 March 2015
Sunday, 1 March 2015
The Victoria Cross
The Victoria Cross has now been in existence for over a hundred and fifty years, and people know that those given the medal have done something above and beyond their duty in order to be awarded it. Traditionally given for valour when faced by the enemy, the prestige of the Victoria Cross ensures that it is normally presented to the recipient by the reigning British monarch.
Up until the Crimean War, there was no way of rewarding the ordinary soldier for acts of heroism. Officers could receive the "Order of the Bath", and enlisted men may have received a Brevet
promotion, scope for both though was limited. The Crimean War saw the first press coverage of a war, and it soon became apparent acts of gallantry were not being recognised. Other countries had awards recognising their soldiers independent of rank, the French for example had the "Legion d’honneur".
In 1854 the Liberal Member of Parliament, Captain Scobell, put forward a motion to instigate a merit based award available to all military personnel. This motion was eventually forwarded to Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. Victoria issued a warrant on the 29th January 1856 that instigated the Victoria Cross, backdating the award to acts of valour in the Crimean War.
Victoria and her husband appear to have been very involved in the inception of the medal. The original idea for the name was the "Military Order of Victoria"; Prince Albert though had this amended to the Victoria Cross. Victoria also insisted that she should make the presentations. Thus the first medals were awarded at a ceremony in Hyde Park on the 26th June 1857. Victoria personally handing out sixty-two medals to recipients from the Crimean War.
The London firm of Hancocks has been responsible for all Crosses produced. Originally all of the VCs were to be made from the bronze of captured Russian cannons from the siege of Sebastapol. Examination of VCs though shows that some have been made from Chinese metal, but whether this is because of Russian use of Chinese cannons or whether there were the remnants of cannons captured in the Boxer Rebellion is unknown.
Current VCs are produced from the barrel of a cannon held in a vault at the Royal Logistic Corps in Telford. When ever it is moved it is always under armed guard.
The cross is a "cross pattee", often described as a Maltese Cross, and stands at 41mm high and 36 mm across. The original design was chosen by Queen Victoria, and is said to have been based on the Army Gold Cross from the Napoleonic Wars. The front of the medal has raised edgings and contains a crown guarded by a lion. Below this emblem is a scroll bearing the words "For Valour", this had been altered by Victoria from "For Bravery". The reverse of the medal also has raised edges, and is engraved with the date of the act for which the award is given.
The cross is suspended from a bar by a ribbon. Originally there were two different coloured ribbons, red for the army and blue for naval recipients, with the formation of the RAF though a universal crimson ribbon was brought in. The bar itself is engraved on the reverse with the recipient’s name, rank and unit.
The rules for the awarding of the Cross are not exactly straightforward. Current wording states the medal is for “… most conspicuous bravery, or some daring or pre-eminent act of valour or self-sacrifice, or extreme devotion to duty in the presence of the enemy.” Ultimately all awards are authorised by the monarch following a recommendation by an army officer.
There have been rule changes throughout the last one hundred years. Originally all recipients had to be alive, although this rule was overlooked during the Boer War and First World War. This rule was only changed in 1920. There is also a ballot clause. In the event that a company of men, such as a ship’s crew is deserving of the award, a ballot is held to pick one recipient. This rule though has not been needed since 1918.
Originally the award was for British troops, this was extended to colonial troops in 1867. It was though only given to colonial troops under the command of British troops. As time progressed though this rule was extended to colonial troops, even if there was no British government or military involvement. This culminated with the award of four medals to Australian troops in Vietnam, even though Britain was not involved in the war.
The wording of the award has also been altered over time. Up until 1881 a medal could be awarded for facing extreme danger, the rules then were changed to be awarded for facing the enemy. Eventually the George Cross was brought in to reward those for valour without facing the enemy, with the GC becoming the joint highest reward.
In the 150 year history of the VC there was only been 1352 recipients. It would be impossible to record all of the exploits that these individuals have undertaken to receive their awards. Each case is as remarkable as the next. I will though mention the three individuals who have received two VCs.
Arthur Martin-Leake (1874-1953) won a VC in the Boer War, where he was a surgeon, and attended the wounded whilst under heavy enemy fire. His second award came during the First World War, where he rescued wounded soldiers whilst under fire.
Noel Chavasse (1884-1917) was also a medic. Both of his awards came during the First World War, in 1916 at Guillemont, he rescued twenty wounded men whilst under fire. The following year tended the wounded despite being seriously wounded himself, wounds he would later die from.
The final recipient was also the only combatant to receive two VCs. Charles Upham (1908-1994), a New Zealander, received his first in 1941 in Crete for close-quarter fighting and rescuing a wounded man. The second came in 1942 whilst in Egypt and despite being wounded he took an enemy position and rescued a number of his wounded men.
There is any number of facts that could be rolled out about the awarding of the Victoria Cross. The largest number of VCs awarded in one action is to the defenders of Rorke’s Drift, as immortalised in the film Zulu, where eleven VCs were awarded. The end of the film records those individual honours.
The most VCs awarded in one day came about in the early days of the Victoria Cross’s existence. On the 16th November 1857, during the Indian Rebellion and the relief of Lucknow, twenty-four VCs were handed out.
The most Crosses handed out in any conflict were the six hundred and thirty-four, during the First World War. There are many other random facts; there are only eleven living holder; no women have received one; four pairs of siblings have had them; and three fathers and sons have been recipients.
Since the end of the Second World War only thirteen VCs have been awarded by Queen Elizabeth II. The most recent ones have been a single one in the 2004 Iraq war, and a posthumous award to Corporal Budd in Afghanistan. In addition there were four awarded in the Korean War; one in Malaysia, four to Australians in the Vietnam War and two in the Falklands conflict.
Today it is impossible for a VC winner to have their award taken from them. King George V altered the law to ensure that even if committed of murder the man was still entitled to the wearing of his award. The change in law also meant that eight men who had forfeited their award were recognised once again. By the time of George V most had already passed away, with their offences being mostly for petty theft.
Canada, Australia and New Zealand have all instigated their own version of the VC since 1991; Victoria Cross (Canada), Victoria Cross of Australia and the Victoria Cross of New Zealand. New Zealand and Australia use the metal from the Crimean War cannons, although Canada are using some other source. As of today only one New Zealand medal has been awarded, Bill Apiata received his medal in 2007 for his actions in Afghanistan.
There are some small benefits for a serviceman winning the VC, an annual annuity of GBP1,495 is paid by the government. Other equivalent amounts are paid by Commonwealth governments to their service personnel. Also a tradition is that any service person will salute the holder of the VC. This results in the Chief of Staff saluting a private, even though there is no rule that this must be done
Personally I would love to have a Victoria Cross although I know I am never going to earn it. They can be brought, which in many ways is a shame in itself. The fact that individuals or families need to sell their Victoria Cross to gain some financial security makes you wonder if the annuity is enough. Then again if I had the money I would buy one. They are not cheap to buy, one of the most recent on the open market was sold for AU$1million. This was the 2006 sale of Captain Alfred Shout 1915 posthumous award. Kerry Stokes who brought the medal is to loan is for display at the Australian War Memorial.
Most people will only be able to view a VC at one of the collections that display them. The public can view forty VCs at the Imperial War Museum in London, or the sixty-one held at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. There are also private collections, the largest of which is held by Lord Ashcroft who has in excess of one hundred and forty VCs.
I am not going to criticise any individual having a private collection, and especially not Lord Ashcroft. It was Lord Ashcroft who put up most of the NZ$300,000 reward for the successful return of 9 Victoria Crosses stolen from the QEII Army Memorial Museum in Waiouru, New Zealand.
Theft of such a sought after item is not unheard of, and whilst the New Zealand medals were returned there are still several circulating on the black market following thefts around the world.
The winner of the VC deserves all the recognition they get. Yes they receive a small financial reward, but they should be recognised for their acts of valour that mean they have done something extraordinary in the face of extreme danger.
Copyright - First Published 27th March 2008
Up until the Crimean War, there was no way of rewarding the ordinary soldier for acts of heroism. Officers could receive the "Order of the Bath", and enlisted men may have received a Brevet
promotion, scope for both though was limited. The Crimean War saw the first press coverage of a war, and it soon became apparent acts of gallantry were not being recognised. Other countries had awards recognising their soldiers independent of rank, the French for example had the "Legion d’honneur".
 |
| Victoria Cross - Public Domain |
Victoria and her husband appear to have been very involved in the inception of the medal. The original idea for the name was the "Military Order of Victoria"; Prince Albert though had this amended to the Victoria Cross. Victoria also insisted that she should make the presentations. Thus the first medals were awarded at a ceremony in Hyde Park on the 26th June 1857. Victoria personally handing out sixty-two medals to recipients from the Crimean War.
The London firm of Hancocks has been responsible for all Crosses produced. Originally all of the VCs were to be made from the bronze of captured Russian cannons from the siege of Sebastapol. Examination of VCs though shows that some have been made from Chinese metal, but whether this is because of Russian use of Chinese cannons or whether there were the remnants of cannons captured in the Boxer Rebellion is unknown.
Current VCs are produced from the barrel of a cannon held in a vault at the Royal Logistic Corps in Telford. When ever it is moved it is always under armed guard.
The cross is a "cross pattee", often described as a Maltese Cross, and stands at 41mm high and 36 mm across. The original design was chosen by Queen Victoria, and is said to have been based on the Army Gold Cross from the Napoleonic Wars. The front of the medal has raised edgings and contains a crown guarded by a lion. Below this emblem is a scroll bearing the words "For Valour", this had been altered by Victoria from "For Bravery". The reverse of the medal also has raised edges, and is engraved with the date of the act for which the award is given.
The cross is suspended from a bar by a ribbon. Originally there were two different coloured ribbons, red for the army and blue for naval recipients, with the formation of the RAF though a universal crimson ribbon was brought in. The bar itself is engraved on the reverse with the recipient’s name, rank and unit.
 |
| Guy Gibson's Medals - Pandaplodder - released into PD |
There have been rule changes throughout the last one hundred years. Originally all recipients had to be alive, although this rule was overlooked during the Boer War and First World War. This rule was only changed in 1920. There is also a ballot clause. In the event that a company of men, such as a ship’s crew is deserving of the award, a ballot is held to pick one recipient. This rule though has not been needed since 1918.
Originally the award was for British troops, this was extended to colonial troops in 1867. It was though only given to colonial troops under the command of British troops. As time progressed though this rule was extended to colonial troops, even if there was no British government or military involvement. This culminated with the award of four medals to Australian troops in Vietnam, even though Britain was not involved in the war.
The wording of the award has also been altered over time. Up until 1881 a medal could be awarded for facing extreme danger, the rules then were changed to be awarded for facing the enemy. Eventually the George Cross was brought in to reward those for valour without facing the enemy, with the GC becoming the joint highest reward.
In the 150 year history of the VC there was only been 1352 recipients. It would be impossible to record all of the exploits that these individuals have undertaken to receive their awards. Each case is as remarkable as the next. I will though mention the three individuals who have received two VCs.
Arthur Martin-Leake (1874-1953) won a VC in the Boer War, where he was a surgeon, and attended the wounded whilst under heavy enemy fire. His second award came during the First World War, where he rescued wounded soldiers whilst under fire.
Noel Chavasse (1884-1917) was also a medic. Both of his awards came during the First World War, in 1916 at Guillemont, he rescued twenty wounded men whilst under fire. The following year tended the wounded despite being seriously wounded himself, wounds he would later die from.
The final recipient was also the only combatant to receive two VCs. Charles Upham (1908-1994), a New Zealander, received his first in 1941 in Crete for close-quarter fighting and rescuing a wounded man. The second came in 1942 whilst in Egypt and despite being wounded he took an enemy position and rescued a number of his wounded men.
There is any number of facts that could be rolled out about the awarding of the Victoria Cross. The largest number of VCs awarded in one action is to the defenders of Rorke’s Drift, as immortalised in the film Zulu, where eleven VCs were awarded. The end of the film records those individual honours.
The most VCs awarded in one day came about in the early days of the Victoria Cross’s existence. On the 16th November 1857, during the Indian Rebellion and the relief of Lucknow, twenty-four VCs were handed out.
The most Crosses handed out in any conflict were the six hundred and thirty-four, during the First World War. There are many other random facts; there are only eleven living holder; no women have received one; four pairs of siblings have had them; and three fathers and sons have been recipients.
Since the end of the Second World War only thirteen VCs have been awarded by Queen Elizabeth II. The most recent ones have been a single one in the 2004 Iraq war, and a posthumous award to Corporal Budd in Afghanistan. In addition there were four awarded in the Korean War; one in Malaysia, four to Australians in the Vietnam War and two in the Falklands conflict.
Today it is impossible for a VC winner to have their award taken from them. King George V altered the law to ensure that even if committed of murder the man was still entitled to the wearing of his award. The change in law also meant that eight men who had forfeited their award were recognised once again. By the time of George V most had already passed away, with their offences being mostly for petty theft.
Canada, Australia and New Zealand have all instigated their own version of the VC since 1991; Victoria Cross (Canada), Victoria Cross of Australia and the Victoria Cross of New Zealand. New Zealand and Australia use the metal from the Crimean War cannons, although Canada are using some other source. As of today only one New Zealand medal has been awarded, Bill Apiata received his medal in 2007 for his actions in Afghanistan.
There are some small benefits for a serviceman winning the VC, an annual annuity of GBP1,495 is paid by the government. Other equivalent amounts are paid by Commonwealth governments to their service personnel. Also a tradition is that any service person will salute the holder of the VC. This results in the Chief of Staff saluting a private, even though there is no rule that this must be done
Personally I would love to have a Victoria Cross although I know I am never going to earn it. They can be brought, which in many ways is a shame in itself. The fact that individuals or families need to sell their Victoria Cross to gain some financial security makes you wonder if the annuity is enough. Then again if I had the money I would buy one. They are not cheap to buy, one of the most recent on the open market was sold for AU$1million. This was the 2006 sale of Captain Alfred Shout 1915 posthumous award. Kerry Stokes who brought the medal is to loan is for display at the Australian War Memorial.
Most people will only be able to view a VC at one of the collections that display them. The public can view forty VCs at the Imperial War Museum in London, or the sixty-one held at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. There are also private collections, the largest of which is held by Lord Ashcroft who has in excess of one hundred and forty VCs.
I am not going to criticise any individual having a private collection, and especially not Lord Ashcroft. It was Lord Ashcroft who put up most of the NZ$300,000 reward for the successful return of 9 Victoria Crosses stolen from the QEII Army Memorial Museum in Waiouru, New Zealand.
Theft of such a sought after item is not unheard of, and whilst the New Zealand medals were returned there are still several circulating on the black market following thefts around the world.
The winner of the VC deserves all the recognition they get. Yes they receive a small financial reward, but they should be recognised for their acts of valour that mean they have done something extraordinary in the face of extreme danger.
Copyright - First Published 27th March 2008
Tuesday, 24 February 2015
The Leaning Tower of Pisa
There are few buildings anywhere in the world that are as iconic as the Leaning Tower of Pisa. One of the most easily identifiable of tourist attractions, the historic monument continues to attract visitors from around the world all year round.
Building of the Tower of Pisa commenced on the 9th August 1173. Set in the Campo del Maracol (Field of Miracles), also known as the Piazza del Duomo, it was originally designed to be the campanile for the adjacent Cathedral and Baptistery. The last of the structures in the square to be built it was of course originally designed to stand upright, but construction started on unstable subsoil.
There is some debate about the original architect for the bell tower. For a long period it has been attributed to Bonanno Pisano, mainly due to his sarcophagus being buried beneath the tower’s footings. Recent ideas though have indicated that Diotsalvi may have the honour as original designer. The Romanesque style is indicative of his work, work that includes the Baptistery and San Nicola tower, both in Pisa.
As already stated though building commenced in an unfortunate place and by the time the tower had reached its third floor, in 1178, a lean to the south-east was easily noticeable. Building on weak subsoil was made worse when the plans only allowed for three metre deep foundations. Made from local white and pastel marble, the first floor is made up of pillars topped with classical capitals against blind arcaded galleries. There are also sculptures of animals to be seen.
Construction though was interrupted as Pisa’s prosperity and security was interrupted with a series of clashes with the neighbouring cities of Florence, Lucca and Genoa. One hundred years passed before construction commenced again in 1272. The delay in construction allowed for the underlying soil to compact, probably saving the tower from collapse.
The building of the tower resumed under the architect Giovanni di Simone. Simone made the decision to compensate for visible lean by building the subsequent floors at an angle against the tilt. A further three floors were built in the years up to 1284, but again the building work ceased when Pisa was defeated in battle by the city of Genoa.
The seventh floor was finally finished in 1319, but it was a further fifty three years before the bell-chamber was added. The bell chamber was the first floor to steer away from the Romanesque style to more of a Gothic one. The second through to the seventh floor have open arcaded galleries, with the repeating arches providing a symmetrical image.
The bell chamber holds seven bells in total, each equating to a note on the musical scale. The L’assunta bell is the heaviest at 3,620kg, but it is La Pasquereccia that has the most history. This bell was originally cast in 1262, and therefore older than the bell chamber, and was originally housed in the Vergata tower in Pisa. There it was used to announce the executions of criminals. It was moved to the campanile in the 18th century to replace a broken bell.
The work by Simone created a curve aspect to the tower, but on completion it stood at 183ft 3in. At an estimated 14,700 tonnes in weight, it is of no surprise that the thickness of the walls at the base stand at 8ft.
In addition to being a tourist attraction since the 12th century, the tower has been a working bell tower. Legend has it that was also used by Galileo Galilei in an experiment about masses and descending speeds. The tower was saved from destruction during the Second World War when it was not bombed despite being an enemy observation post.
Saved from destruction during the war, collapse has often been seen to be imminent because of the lean that has increased over the years.
Mussolini during the 1930s actually attempted to straighten the tower by pouring concrete into the foundations; this though only caused further problems as the tower sank further. By1964 the problem was so acute that the Italian government asked for help from across the world. Plans were discussed with mathematicians and engineers involved. Whilst it was discovered that sunlight was causing the stonework to expand and contract on a daily basis, there were few ideas on how to solve the problem of the continuing lean. By the 1980s the lean was still increasing by 0.05 inches per year, giving the tower a finite lifespan until it collapsed.
Drastic solutions were called for and so on 7th January 1990 the tower was closed to tourists, and the bells were silenced. The tower needed to be straightened. 70 tonnes of earth (thirty-eight cubic metres) were removed from underneath the tower whilst steel cables and lead weights held the tower up. This removal of earth, completed in 2001, straightened the tower by 17 inches, returning the tower to the leaning position of 1838.
Today the tower leans at 3.97 degrees, and there is confidence amongst engineers that the tower is safe for another 300 years. Work on the tower is still continuing today, though this has more to do with aesthetics than structural safety, and today the work comprises of surface restoration to remove corrosion and blackening of the white marble.
The Piazza del Duomo has been designated a UNESCO World Heritage site and continues to attract thousands of tourists daily. So many tourists cannot be wrong; it is well worth a visit. By 2007 the tower had reopened and limited numbers of visitors are allowed to ascend the internal staircase to take in the views from the top of the tower. Tickets can be purchased from the nearby tower tourist office, but each ticket has a time on it which may be a number of hours in the future. Get there early enough and you can spend the day in the cathedral and baptistery until your entry time comes round.
It may be difficult to avoid the street sellers, and tourists taking photos as their friends pose holding the tower up, or pushing it over, but enjoy the experience. When your time comes be prepared for the walk up the stairs, there are 294 or 296 steps to the bell chamber. There are two steps left on the north facing stair case. Also look out for the last steps up to the bell chamber, the staircase is fairly narrow and claustrophobic. Also don’t be surprised when the bells go off as you arrive at the top, entrances timing seem to be made just for that event.
Even without the obvious leave, the tower is a remarkable piece of architecture which is over 800 years old. The views from the top are impressive of the low level city but it is the history of the site that is inspiring.
Copyright - First Published 21st March 2008
Building of the Tower of Pisa commenced on the 9th August 1173. Set in the Campo del Maracol (Field of Miracles), also known as the Piazza del Duomo, it was originally designed to be the campanile for the adjacent Cathedral and Baptistery. The last of the structures in the square to be built it was of course originally designed to stand upright, but construction started on unstable subsoil.
 |
| The Leaning Tower of Pisa - Alkarex Malin äger - CC-BY-SA-3.0 |
As already stated though building commenced in an unfortunate place and by the time the tower had reached its third floor, in 1178, a lean to the south-east was easily noticeable. Building on weak subsoil was made worse when the plans only allowed for three metre deep foundations. Made from local white and pastel marble, the first floor is made up of pillars topped with classical capitals against blind arcaded galleries. There are also sculptures of animals to be seen.
Construction though was interrupted as Pisa’s prosperity and security was interrupted with a series of clashes with the neighbouring cities of Florence, Lucca and Genoa. One hundred years passed before construction commenced again in 1272. The delay in construction allowed for the underlying soil to compact, probably saving the tower from collapse.
The building of the tower resumed under the architect Giovanni di Simone. Simone made the decision to compensate for visible lean by building the subsequent floors at an angle against the tilt. A further three floors were built in the years up to 1284, but again the building work ceased when Pisa was defeated in battle by the city of Genoa.
 |
| Leaning Tower and Basilica - Georges Jansoone - CC-BY-SA-3.0 |
The bell chamber holds seven bells in total, each equating to a note on the musical scale. The L’assunta bell is the heaviest at 3,620kg, but it is La Pasquereccia that has the most history. This bell was originally cast in 1262, and therefore older than the bell chamber, and was originally housed in the Vergata tower in Pisa. There it was used to announce the executions of criminals. It was moved to the campanile in the 18th century to replace a broken bell.
The work by Simone created a curve aspect to the tower, but on completion it stood at 183ft 3in. At an estimated 14,700 tonnes in weight, it is of no surprise that the thickness of the walls at the base stand at 8ft.
In addition to being a tourist attraction since the 12th century, the tower has been a working bell tower. Legend has it that was also used by Galileo Galilei in an experiment about masses and descending speeds. The tower was saved from destruction during the Second World War when it was not bombed despite being an enemy observation post.
Saved from destruction during the war, collapse has often been seen to be imminent because of the lean that has increased over the years.
Mussolini during the 1930s actually attempted to straighten the tower by pouring concrete into the foundations; this though only caused further problems as the tower sank further. By1964 the problem was so acute that the Italian government asked for help from across the world. Plans were discussed with mathematicians and engineers involved. Whilst it was discovered that sunlight was causing the stonework to expand and contract on a daily basis, there were few ideas on how to solve the problem of the continuing lean. By the 1980s the lean was still increasing by 0.05 inches per year, giving the tower a finite lifespan until it collapsed.
Drastic solutions were called for and so on 7th January 1990 the tower was closed to tourists, and the bells were silenced. The tower needed to be straightened. 70 tonnes of earth (thirty-eight cubic metres) were removed from underneath the tower whilst steel cables and lead weights held the tower up. This removal of earth, completed in 2001, straightened the tower by 17 inches, returning the tower to the leaning position of 1838.
Today the tower leans at 3.97 degrees, and there is confidence amongst engineers that the tower is safe for another 300 years. Work on the tower is still continuing today, though this has more to do with aesthetics than structural safety, and today the work comprises of surface restoration to remove corrosion and blackening of the white marble.
The Piazza del Duomo has been designated a UNESCO World Heritage site and continues to attract thousands of tourists daily. So many tourists cannot be wrong; it is well worth a visit. By 2007 the tower had reopened and limited numbers of visitors are allowed to ascend the internal staircase to take in the views from the top of the tower. Tickets can be purchased from the nearby tower tourist office, but each ticket has a time on it which may be a number of hours in the future. Get there early enough and you can spend the day in the cathedral and baptistery until your entry time comes round.
It may be difficult to avoid the street sellers, and tourists taking photos as their friends pose holding the tower up, or pushing it over, but enjoy the experience. When your time comes be prepared for the walk up the stairs, there are 294 or 296 steps to the bell chamber. There are two steps left on the north facing stair case. Also look out for the last steps up to the bell chamber, the staircase is fairly narrow and claustrophobic. Also don’t be surprised when the bells go off as you arrive at the top, entrances timing seem to be made just for that event.
Even without the obvious leave, the tower is a remarkable piece of architecture which is over 800 years old. The views from the top are impressive of the low level city but it is the history of the site that is inspiring.
Copyright - First Published 21st March 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)